India top court gives BJP govt 4 weeks to reply to petitions challenging Article 370 – World

On Tuesday, a bank of five judges of the Supreme Court of India granted the government four weeks to submit their response to a batch of petitions challenging the repeal of the special status of Kashmir occupied under Article 370 of the Constitution, Indian media reported. .

The SC also imposed an embargo on the submission of any new appeal request that defies constitutional validity in abrogation of Article 370, said The quint.

The bank will take the matter on November 14. The government led by the Bharatiya Janata Party stripped occupied Kashmir of its autonomy on August 5, while placing the valley locked and arresting Kashmir leaders in an attempt to avoid protests against the measure. On October 5, the blockade will have been in effect for two months.

The pleas have questioned the blocking of communication in occupied Kashmir, the illegal detention of children and the impact of restrictions on medical care.

The Supreme Court banking, headed by Judge NV Ramana, allowed the government and the occupied administration of Jammu and Kashmir to submit affidavits against petitions that challenge the elimination of article 370.

The higher court rejected the petitioners' request not to be granted more than two weeks, he said The Hindu.

Lead lawyer Raju Ramachandran said the fork of the occupied Jammu and Kashmir, approved by the Indian parliament on August 5, would take effect on October 31. "The process will be irreversible and the requests should not be fruitless." court, according to Scroll.in.

Meanwhile, in all requests and requests related to the blockade, the Supreme Court ordered the government to submit its response and postponed the matter until October 16.

The court refused to file a petition to lift the curbs on the Internet and landline services in all hospitals and medical facilities in occupied Kashmir, he said The quintinstead, it orders the petitioner to approach the Superior Court of Jammu and Kashmir.

However, lead lawyer Tushar Mehta told the court that there were no restrictions on the movement now and requested two weeks to submit a response on the issue of personal freedom.

On Monday, the court had postponed the hearings for one day and said the three-judge court headed by the President of the Supreme Court of India, Ranjan Gogoi, did not have time to hear the statements. "We have the case of the constitution bank [Ayodhya dispute] listen, "Gogoi said.

Among the petitions, defenders ML Sharma, Shakir Shabir and Soyaib Qureshi have presented three against the repression of security. Sharma was the first petitioner to challenge the presidential order that the government used to empty article 370, he said. Scroll.in.

Members of the National Lok Sabha Conference, Mohammad Akbar Lone and Hasnain Masoodi, also filed a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution, which allows the Supreme Court to issue any order to protect the fundamental rights of citizens, Scroll.in additional. According to them, the presidential order was "unconstitutional, null and void" in occupied Kashmir.