Ayodia Incident: One of the oldest examples in the country Ayodia Incident But the verdict arrived. The constitutional bench, led by Justice Ranjan Gogoi, rejected Nirmohi Akhara and Shia Waqf Board's claims during the ruling. Ramjanmabhoomi Nyas received a land of disputes in Ayodhya. In addition, the Muslim side was ordered to provide land to other places. The Supreme Court ordered the government to build trust.
Contents
The temple will be built there, and the temple will be built. Read the big ones of the decision to Ayo meditation.
The verdict, one of the oldest events in the country, is about the Ayodia conflict. The constitutional bench, led by Justice Ranjan Gogoi, rejected Nirmohi Akhara and Shia Waqf Board's claims during the ruling. Ramjanmabhoomi Nyas received a land of disputes in Ayodhya. In addition, a separate land was ordered on the date of the ruling of the Babelite member on the Muslim side. The Supreme Court ordered the government to build trust.
A big decision
- Supreme Court ruling against Ayodhya, temple paved avenue
- Ramjanmabhoomi Trust will get land of dispute
- Sunni Kff Gets 5 Acres of Alternative Land
- Rejection of claims by Nirmohi Akhara and Shia Waqf Board
- Party Gopal Visharad Got Recitation Rights
- In three months the central government will form a temple trust
- The new trust will open the construction of the Ram Temple
- Responsibilities of the Yogi government to provide land to the Islamic side
- Decisions based on law, not faith and trust
Muslims could not prove monopoly
Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi read the verdict through a document stating that Hindus were not worshiped before 1885. Ramchabutara worshiped in Sita's kitchen in the outer yard. The riots broke out in 1934. Since then, Muslim exclusive rights have not existed within. Muslims have not been able to prove monopoly ever since. Hindus surely continued to worship outside. On December 6, 1992, the temple structure was demolished. Railings were installed in 1886.
See Sarkari results.
This constitutional bench verdicted
The Supreme Court's Constitutional Bench ruled the Ayodia conflict. The bench was ruled by Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice SA Bobde, Justice Dhananjay Yashwant Chandrachud, Justice Ashok Bhushan, and Abdul Nazeer. What is special is that this decision was offered unanimously by five judges.
.