SC to take up Justice Isa’s plea on Sept 17

–7-person bench led by CJP, Justice Bandial

Islamabad: The Supreme Court (SC) on Thursday constituted a larger bench led by Judge Umar Atta Bandial, who could hear Judge Faez Isa's constitutional petition for an offense filed by Judge Umar Atta Bandial to himself in this Justice Supreme Court Justice (SJC).

At the request of the Isa Judge, the 7-man bench organized by the Supreme Court will process the plea on September 17.

In addition to Judge Bandial, other members of the bench include Judge Maqbool Baqar, Judge Manzoor Ahmad Malik, Judge Sardar Tariq Masood, Judge Faisal Arab, Judge Ijazul Ahsan, and Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel.

In a South Carolina petition, the judicial judge sought the construction of a court bench where he could hear the statement raised against himself, accusing the Supreme Court of Asif Saeed Khosa of the Pakistan Court (CJP) of “showing personal bias against him”.

“The language spoken by the Supreme Court [of Pakistan] in [Supreme Judicial] The council's order sadly shows prejudice and prejudice against his sovereignty [Justice Isa]Pleading.

Several excellent lawyers, including the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Pakistan Bar Association (PBC), have filed against the Justice, arguing that the ruling on the Justice Justice is motivated by a judgment on the case of the Pie Javanese. You have disputed a bibliography.

Last month, the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) dismissed a statement submitted to the Court of Justice for writing a letter to President Arif Albi in the case of alleged possession of an undisclosed foreign property.

SJC's five-person bench, led by CJP Asif Saeed Khosa, read the verdict on the pre-court judgment. The Chief Justice said that the court did not find any "serious" problems to constitute an offense or to remove him from his position.

The dismissed references were submitted after writing a letter to Alvi after sending a report on references to himself in the mainstream media.

In this letter, he asked the president to let him know if there was any truth in this report.

“I need to know that, according to Article 209 of the Constitution, a government source states that a reference has been made to me. If you need to let me know if this is correct or not, please provide a copy of the reference to that claim. ”According to media reports, the president quoted this letter.

The Supreme Court Justice, who became the Chief Justice, complained about leaking letters to the media, saying that "selective leaks" are also associated with personal assassination, violating his rights to fair trial and violating dignity. Of the judiciary.

FAIZABAD Sit Verdik:

Many observers believe that this mention is an attempt to threaten a judicial decree on his verdict on Phi Javad others.

An additional lawyer, Zahid F Ebrahim, also resigned from his resignation, accusing the government of attempting to “plunder the judiciary”.

The senior judge issued a verdict on the Sit, which placed great importance on the military's involvement in political activities and called on constitutional ambitions.

It instructed the Pentagon and the military, navy and air force captains to punish personnel on their orders found to have violated the oath.

His verdict also criticized Pakistan's Te Khri e-Insapur (PTI) for demonstrations in 2014. According to the verdict, a precedent was set for the Terik-e-la Bak Pakistan (TLP) demonstration in the capital paralyzed by twins. City over 20 days.

The verdict uffled many feathers and filed at least three petitions for the verdict.

In the petition filed by the PTI, it was ruled that a review was necessary to avoid suffocation due to defects and injustice.

Inter-Services Intelligence (IIS) approached the court through the Department of Defense to challenge the ruling.

The petition filed by Attorney General Anwar Mansoor Khan and spokesman Nawaz Chaudhry believes that some military officers can violate the basic rights of citizens, support certain political parties, and give cash to extremists “can affect the class”. Said. And file fraud ”

The ruling claimed that it included "weird observations and negative declarative remarks" about the military.