Disney Plus’ butt cover-up hides a much bigger problem

There is a scene in the 1984 movie by Touchstone Pictures. fried food Young Tom Hanks sees a beautiful naked mermaid fleeing to the sea. In the original version, the camera follows Hanks' gaze and glimpses the naked ass. fried food Although rated PG for the insulation that comes with the shots, those who watch movies on Disney Plus welcome a completely different version of the scene.

Thanks to the tweets below, in an intense re-edited version, Disney used CGI hair to cover actress Daryl Hannah's body. Disney representatives The budge In that "some scenes" fried food "Slightly edited to remove nudity", but I didn't specify when to edit.

The contact person is also fried foodYour rating goes back to PG from Disney Plus's PG-13 (different from the original). If it came out a few months later, it is possible that the original movie (short nude) was rated as PG-13 fried food It was released in March 1984 and the PG-13 rating did not exist until July 1984.

Social media users were embarrassed by this change. If overexposure was the problem fried food Others from Disney's other streaming service, Hulu, asked why Disney felt the need to edit the scene at all. Disney Plus accepts movies with a rating of up to PG-13 in the service. fried food PG rating. Other people have a scene Thor: Ragnarok It includes Hulk's naked ass was not censored. When brought to Disney Plus (because it's completely related to CGI characters, there may be a difference between real overexposure and perception of overexposure.)

fried food It's the most daunting example of a movie re-edited for Disney Plus, but it's not the most unique. New version Star Wars: New Hope On the day the streaming service started, it appeared on Disney Plus. “It was created by George before the Disney acquisition. The budge At the time.

Disney also creates a pre-roll message that plays before a specific movie to inform viewers of the edited scene for a specific reason. The company removed the word "fuck" from the movie. Baby Sitting Adventure and Free solo, Brought out racial slurs that appear in the same old title. Bullwhip Griffin's Adventure, Editing different materials in the same movie Dream empire Disney thought it was no longer appropriate.

fried food There is a constant debate about the changing media in the digital space. It has been a fierce debate for decades. When George Lucas edited, the fans were angry. New Hope, Greedo shot first instead of Han. People accused Lucas and the 20th Century Fox of not releasing the original version of the movie. Legal version of New hope It exists to help people buy, download or stream Greedo shooting features today. Lucas and Fox not only replaced the original scene with a slight change, but were also unable to purchase the original when reprinted.

Last march Simpson Producer James L. Brooks announced that future syndication packages, streaming and future DVD releases will not include the Season 3 premiere episode, "Stark Raving Dad." This episode includes a voice played by Michael Jackson, and after a new claim to Jackson The Simpsons & # 39; Tim and Fox decided to delete the episode effectively. “This is our book and we can make chapters,” Brooks said. that much Wall Street Journal At the time.

"As physical media provides a streaming method, large companies have greater control over what we can and cannot see." slateIsaac Butler wrote about this issue. “This gives unprecedented power to get rid of annoying things. Whether we agree with a particular case of memory holding or not, this practice is deeply problematic and its history is even more so. ”

Disney is more than just a big company. Surely that much monolith. Disney bought the 21st century Fox, a company that Butler was concerned about. Disney also built an entire sales campaign based on the idea of ​​restricting access to the physical version of the movie. Now I am editing the scene for a streaming service and everyone is getting a message explaining why. Subscribers cannot watch the original movie as intended.

Efforts to be a better or better company, but not always effective. There is a better alternative. have Tom and Jerry, E.g. Warner Bros. of the 1940s. The cartoon series provided disclaimer for the context of certain scenes when Warner Home Video was first released on DVD and in 2014 the episode was digitally available for iTunes and Amazon Prime. Warner Brothers did not erase or edit the show. Instead, the company decided to take a critical test. History cannot be erased, but people can learn from it.

Retrospective editing of a movie to fit a specific narrative or niche is a constant concern in the film, television, and music worlds. Concerns about the original presentation continue to grow as more people use streaming services to edit files on the fly. In today's old Tom Hanks movie, having bad CGI hair on your hips can be a more sophisticated edit and change tomorrow.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top