‘Travesty of justice’: Pakistani politicians, civil society react to Ayodhya verdict – World

Politicians and journalists question the merit and timing of the ruling of the Supreme Court of India.

The Supreme Court of India on Saturday, in its order on a long land dispute in Ayodhya, said a temple would be built on the site, while acknowledging that the demolition of the 460-year-old Babri Mosque in 1992 was a rape. Of law.

The verdict was issued hours before the opening of the Kartarpur Corridor, which allows Indian Sikhs to reach Pakistan without a visa to pilgrimage to the sanctuary of Guru Nanak Dev, the founder of Sikhism.

The verdict, which probably affects the already tense relationship between the Muslim and Hindu Hindu communities, provoked strong reactions from politicians and journalists in Pakistan, who questioned the merit of the trial and also raised questions about the moment.


Leader of the opposition in the National Assembly Shehbaz Sharif He described the verdict as "parody of justice."

"The trial of India SC in the Babri Masjid land dispute represents the parody of justice," tweeted. "It is yet another sign of how the saffron ideology is consuming the vital elements of Indian society and the entire secularism project is collapsing brick by brick. Indian Muslims are being pushed against the wall."


Human rights minister Shireen Mazari He said the verdict marked the "end of the facade of secular India."

in a cheepnoted that the superior court of India "[accepted] that desecration of the mosque was [against] the law and [held] Further on the control of internal and external areas, etc., the core of the trial is: lands in dispute that will be handed over to a Board of Trustees to build Ram Mandir. Muslims will be given alternative land! "

"So, basically, Hindutva wins when SC creates a Trust to be given land to build a temple that says that the mosque cannot be in that place! End of the secular India's facade. Indian SC in tune with the Modi Hindutva narrative! "


Minister of Science and Technology Fawad Chaudhry, in a tweet, he described the verdict as "shameful, unpleasant, illegal and immoral."


MNA Asad Umar warned that "extremist views […] now they are becoming widespread in the state institutions of India too. "

He also said: "As an extremist, xenophobic thinking takes control of the Indian state and society, nuclear India emerges as the greatest threat to global peace."


JUI-F Chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman issued a statement and said: "We condemn the verdict of the Supreme Court of India […] It reflects a narrow mind. India has failed to protect its minorities. "


Foreign minister Shah Mahmood Qureshiwhile talking with DawnNewsTV, questioned the moment of the verdict.

"Couldn't (the verdict) wait a couple of days?" she asked. "I think extreme callousness has been demonstrated on a happy occasion and I am very sad."

In a separate conversation with Geo News, Qureshi said the ministry will examine the verdict and issue a statement about the content.


PPP Senator Sherry Rehman He noted that while Pakistan opened the Kartarpur Corridor for the Indian Sikhs, the Indian Supreme Court had announced a verdict against the Muslim community.

"This is a reflection of a new India that we should understand. It is not intended that its constitution (of India) or any institution provide protection to Muslims," ​​he said while speaking with Geo News.

"You have seen how non-citizens are treated in Assam. On the other hand, Pakistan's treatment of non-citizens is completely opposite where [the state] wants its integration into society. "

He also criticized the government for not protesting against the actions of India.


PPP Senator Rehman Malik He pointed out the moment of the verdict and said: "PM Modi / RSS once again demonstrated anti-Muslim syndromes and anti-Sikh feelings to have the judgment of replacing the temple / Mander with Babari Masjid on the day of the opening of the sacred corridor" Kartarpur Sikh "today (sic). This is the message against the peace of Prime Minister Modi to Pakistan today."


Sindh Governor Imran Ismail said: "What a shameful decision of the Supreme Court of India. Pakistan, on the other hand, is restoring Kartapur while India is destroying the historic mosque. @ImranKhanPTI shows a gesture towards minorities and @narendramodi demonstrating their loyalty with RSS. Indians must reject this extremism. "


The community of journalists also expressed disappointment at the verdict. Former Dawn editor Abbas Nasir tweeted: "BJP and the Supreme Court of India come together to vindicate Jinnah. Well done."


Presenter Hamid Mirwhile talking with Geo NewsHe described the verdict as a "political decision." He said the announcement of the verdict on a weekend, which coincided with the opening of the Kartarpur Corridor, was also "political."

"I am forced to say that the verdict of the Supreme Court of India on the Babri Mosque [lead to] a fall in [the judiciary’s] image and structure of the Indian constitution. "


lawyer Taimur Malik said also criticized the verdict of Ayodhya and said: "On this ninth day of November 2019, the civil and military institutions of Pakistan have won the hearts of an entire religious population by opening the #KartarpurCorridor, while the judiciary of India, once famous and independent, has failed to the main religious minority of the country through #AyodhyaJudgement ".

Source: https://www.dawn.com/news/1515845/travesty-of-justice-pakistani-politicians-civil-society-react-to-ayodhya-verdict

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here