‘BCCI amendments, if permitted, will mean ridiculing of the Supreme Court’

The adoption of the amendment proposed by the BCCI into the Constitution, if not challenged, is related to the "mocking" of the Supreme Court and will strive to introduce reforms into the richest and most powerful cricket committee in the past few years.

It is the opinion of the Secretary-General of Gopal Sankaranarayanan of the RM Lodha Committee, which was approved by the Supreme Court on July 18, 2016. The Lodha Commission, appointed by the Court in 2015, together with the former Indian Minister of Justice, Lodha Justice, former Supreme Court Justices RV Raveendran and Ashok Bhan.

In an interview with ESPNcricinfo, Sankaranarayanan said the country's Supreme Court is still "playing a role" in this matter and could challenge the public if BCCI's proposed changes are adopted. But he admitted that the court itself accused him of progressively "diluting" the reforms first approved three years ago.

Sankaranarayanan was the first to closely relate to the drafting of the reform in response to BCCI's proposal. Chief Justice (Retd) Lodha said he stopped talking about the BCCI issue when he contacted reporters on Monday.

The constitutional change proposal was revealed last Saturday when BCCI's new secretary, Jay Shah, disseminated the agenda for the annual meeting of the board of directors, which will be held on December 1. The Constitution, registered in August 2018, was written by the Administrative Committee (CoA).

The most radical amendments include changing the rules regarding the cooling period of secretariat owners, easing various disqualification criteria and eliminating the need for a constitutional change for approval by the Supreme Court.

Sankaranarayanan said that by adopting this proposal, no reforms would exist. "If this is allowed and still unchallenged in the court and the Supreme Court is not challenged before, or doesn't occupy Sumotu, it means the mockery of the Supreme Court and everything about it." It will mean that most of the important changes will be gone. "

He pointed out that BCCI is working to mitigate reforms that have already been resumed on several benches of the courts, following a major ruling issued by Indian Supreme Court TS Thakur in July 2016. It suggests that the rest of the reforms are almost fully realized since the Supreme Court's intervention. They think that some sort of artifact remains after the Supreme Court's investigation of the items for several years.

"They did not forbid the Supreme Court to amend our Constitution, so we have the ability to amend the Constitution and make all kinds of changes." They will guarantee how everything that remains after the Supreme Court itself has turned a lot back. [original reforms] Allowed old thieves to continue to work in a big way. "

The amendment is elected by the General Assembly at the BCCI AGM on December 1, consists of elected representatives of the state association, and a majority of three quarters must pass. After that, the board needs the approval of the court to change the constitution to accommodate the amendment.

Sankaranarayanan said the court will “play a role” even if BCCI does not believe whether the amendment was unanimously approved. "They are trying to imply that they no longer need the Supreme Court's punishment [the board] Permute [to the constitution]"The way the Supreme Court has approached this approach over the years, it is very clear that all the reforms made through the ruling are complete and final." Changes made by the judgment cannot be resolved without the consent of the court. If you want to change everything that the court handled, you have to go back to court.

"There is no difference in the case of an unanimity or a majority of three-thirds or any other. The court believes that the court will play that role during all these periods. Was concrete when [in 2016]And last year, he approved the Constitution written and submitted by CoA. "

The BCCI upheaval was triggered by a petition by Bihar Cricket Association secretary Aditya Verma at the Supreme Court on the IPL corruption incident in 2013. Sankaranarayanan said an outsider could knock on the court door again to draw attention to BCCI's recent move. "The outsider will certainly take place because the Supreme Court brought it to court with the representatives of the Bihar Cricket Association."

Sankaranarayanan felt that the intervention of the court had no effect on the BCCI, but again threatened to become an exclusive club. sports.

However, the Lodha Committee agreed that more protection could be in place to make the reforms more complete, and judged that the courts had set foot in the revision of a series of reforms in 2016. This allowed the BCCI and the state association to raise opposition. "Of course, I hope the Supreme Court will not change its views and keep diluting reforms every time the new bench reviews this issue. That's exactly what happened."

"What we are seeing as the final version of the Constitution that BCCI now wants to revise even more is the shadow of what was first proposed by the reforms. A small adjustment is understandable, but after the final ruling of the Supreme Court, Thakur's bench and review were rejected. There would no longer have been a jurisdiction that would allow change. In this case the rule of law was very flexible on the benefits of BCCI. I hope it will not be repeated. ”


Source Link : http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/story/1206403.html?CMP=OTC-RSS


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here