Rory Burns shows the value of picking specialists

Michael Gove generally thinks there are enough professionals in society, but from a British cricket perspective, it starts to look like a pretty good idea.

Having reached the third 50 in the series, Rory Burns provided additional evidence of the wisdom of picking a professional player for the profession. After Andrew Strauss's retirement, he became the third British opener to reach 50 times in a single series-Alastair Cook and Alex Hales against Sri Lanka in 2016 so far in the series Half a century between them.

This is not surprising. Burns spent most of his career at the top of the order. He scored 1,000 points in each of the last five domestic first-class seasons and learned his trade well in the process. Such a challenge, that is, this surface, this ball shows little mystery to him.

With these statistics in mind, it's strange to take too long to choose an image. Instead, the British cricket pursued a policy of choosing an aggressive opener and even selected aggressive top-notch hitters towards Burns as a last resort. But he showed men not only aesthetically pleasing but seemingly effective, as well as the wisdom of choosing a player who understands the specific challenges of the role.

Burns' success is achieved not only in technical capacity, but also in mental resilience. But it is a combination of two factors that make him a valuable player. Because he admits that when he is beaten on the stump or outside, there will be time for an attack, especially as good as this one. However, some of his colleagues pushed and pulled the ball that protruded from the outer edge, but Burns took a line and played with bats under his body and eyes. And some of his colleagues became insecure and allowed to increase pressure, but Burns has a generous attitude of a man who accepts such indifference as part of his work. Whether he was victorious or defeated, he left each delivery behind and focused on the next. It was innings that made Cook proud.

Josh Hazlewood said, "He knows his game well and is doing his best to do it." "He has the best value in spells. He seems to be a good player."

Several factors helped to burn. First, Mitchell Starc released some pressure without maintaining full control of his colleagues. Burns moved 22 of 10 deliveries at a time. It was a feast compared to the rest of his innings. In comparison, he managed only once in Hazlewood and there were no 47 deliveries faced by Pat Cummins.

Also read: Cummins, Hazlewood in Structure Structure

Another factor that helped him was Australia's policy of testing him with a short ball. When delivery was difficult at the beginning of the series – twice with a short ball in Leeds, and once in Edgbaston and Lord & # 39; s respectively – were fired from this relatively slow surface, but he was in trouble riding a duck I had time to fall out. And while Australia was focusing on employment, they were wasting their chances of dissolution through external boundaries.

But this was the most obvious inning of his 11-Test career. He not only felt himself manageable, but also seemed to belong. Edgbaston struggled to fight Nathan Lyon. Yes, he had a century. But he would have admitted for the first time that he had some luck along the way-he comforted him here on day 3 despite the amazing turnover. pitch. Burns didn't try to drive and waited for something short instead. He cut him three times four times, and in other cases he swept in front of the square. As a result, Australia had to install a sweeper, slightly reduced pressure around the bat, and a few more holes in the stadium.

Burns said, "It wasn't a bad ball." Nice ball that demanded a stroke before it popped out. "Sometimes it was one of those people who could walk peacefully with themselves.

"A short ball may not be a bad plan for a surface that doesn't provide mass in terms of seam movement, but as Steve Smith said, you don't have to worry about bouncing too much when facing a guard. Things and bats for a long time. It was a scrap and a mental challenge but very enjoyable. "

It is premature to envision Burns as a Burns that can replace the route. He has gained experience with the role but led the 2018 Surrey to the County Championship title. He needs to do more before he is auto-selected in the long run. This was an encouraging progress, but many points must be scored for a long time before it is considered a viable alternative.

In this series it is worth contrasting Burns' experience at the top of the order with the experience of other British openers. On one stage Thursday night, Joe Denly-the latest sacrifice at the top of the order hit four balls in a row at Hazlewood. On the other hand, he was bumped into the shoulders by Stark guards. Two balls before he went out, he was beaten on both edges by Cummins. It was a tremendous hump that Denly didn't know which ball to leave and suggested that he didn't play a compact game to avoid slipping the outer edges. In a word he seemed to be a man parachuting in the opening position.

And Jason Roy is there. The knocking effect of Burns' excellent third class stand with Joe Root was to delay Roy's reaching wrinkles until he was 65 years old. As a result, he could theoretically see against older, smoother balls and bowling attacks, but in reality there were few signs. And after a while, he noticed that he helped by tying three boundaries between the reverse point and the extra cover.

But not long after, bothered him with that technical flaw. I pushed one out of the nice, certified Hazlewood that I tear off from the seam, leaving a hole between the bat and the pad, pushing my hand ahead of the front pad. There aren't as many bowlers-and fair as Hazlewood, but they will find the difference and exploit it. Roy's confidence, and indeed his test career, may have been compromised by urging the batter on the spot. Exam cricket is enough not to learn new trades for a job. Burns showed the value of specialization.


Source Link :


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here